“Deconomics”: Extracting Economic Value from User Data

This post forms a continuation of a series of posts outlining the bare bones underpinnings — the basic philosophical stance — that characterises the various facets of our project; in particular our game-changing economic model we call “deconomics” (decentralised economics).

Decentr: Extracting Economic Value from Secure User Data

In this post, we aim to describe in more detail how deconomics is a naturally emergent heterodox school of economics that underpins a “true” data economy as part of our Web 3.0/4.0 solution.

Deconomics is based on heterodox and behavioural economics, with the addition of Einsteinian relativity extended into the economic arena (due to our tech rendering Web 3.0/4.0 “causal”); this conflation of disciplines means our tech and algorithms can at first sound a little weird. Crazy even. (Some of the results we are getting from our algorithms most certainly do.)

As a result, the eyes of most mainstream economists glaze over when we deliver them our deconomics paper.

All we ask, then — with the global economy already threatening to crash at the slightest sign of economic turmoil or other threat — is for you to keep an open mind, and join the debate.

We genuinely seek to engage as regards our deconomics models so we can adjust and improve deconomics, but mainstream economists — often blinkered by the false, dichotomous reality of mainstream economics — choose not to do so. (More on that in upcoming posts.) They simply dismiss our findings as “obviously” false dogmas (without disproving them or offering alternatives).

Admittedly, we see “economics” from a different perspective than mainstream economists. A very different perspective — and they don’t like it, sure. Who has more to gain by fawningly maintaining the lopsided status quo for their banking and political masters than certain outspoken, anti-crypto mainstream economists?

However, what can really irk some people is that we also see decentralisation/digital currencies from a different standpoint than most.

In essence, we don’t think crypto is really what most people assume it to be and does what people assume it does, can, should or ever will. Ditto current blockchains.

So from this point onwards in this post we might upset some of you dyed-in-the-wool crypto enthusiasts [UPDATE 9th April: or it would have prior to the current global crash validating this article as correct], but hear us out. A truly decentralised economy is all that matters, no matter how we get there, right? It will all make sense as you read.

We are literal decentralisation evangelists but — and it’s a big “but” — we dispute that blockchain is really decentralised at all. So far, so good, but — and here’s the kicker if we all with a cool head follow that logic — if we agree that blockchain is not decentralised then nor can be the tokens it supports. With that assumption accepted, then we also must accept the distinction between digital tokens and fiat becomes less clear at a foundational conceptual and economic level.

So maybe we’re all seeing this wrong. Blinded by the promise of a decentralised world, maybe we’re all being too quick to overlook the myriad shortfalls of the tech being developed to deliver on this promise and the tokens that will reputedly underwrite it.

As sacrilegious as this may sound in certain quarters, we all need to stop and think that maybe digital coins are not the whole answer to human economic liberation and egalitarian wealth creation for all. Perhaps we’re better off bypassing the expensive-to-mine, energy-wasting and difficult-to-spend digital tokens as a solution to an egalitarian global super-economy and replace them with… well, replace them with what exactly?

By definition and design, any coin created (digital or fiat) for any purposes on any platform, blockchain, state or private printing press, is by definition for anyone who hasn’t created it a third-party medium of exchange. Fiat-money is the “middle-man” between desire and acquisition. (And middle men always take their cut, especially of bent dreams rent of their original purpose.) If this is assumed to be true then any coin (fiat or digital) can only ever be issued and used as part of centralised or at least part- or pseudo-centralised system.

And then we’re careening back to square one.

This is yet another reason why mainstream take-up of blockchain and digital tokens is not happening, and merely remains, on the whole, another method for an informed minority to enrich themselves while the uninformed majority has no interest, access or inclination to get involved. (And uninformed majorities have a habit of staying impoverished, disenfranchised and disincentivised to participate.)

Sound familiar? That’s right: it is no different to every other centralised or psuedo-decentralised digital or real-world economic system or currency ever invented.

And how are those systems and currencies currently working out for you?

Probably not very well; and it will only take one little push — just one minor, purportedly “unexpected” social or economic kink — and the entire global economy will collapse with the streamlined surety of a line of dominoes.

That will be sooner than you think.

And blockhain? Ten years on and it is still not exactly fulfilling its potential in any realm, and alas, we don’t think it ever can due to this increasingly restrictive, Emperor’s New Clothes masquerade we’re all compelled to go along with as a “decentralised” money solution.

This is where we step in with our radically-new tech/deconomics.

Fundamentally, it is simple: we need to remove money as an impediment for trade and exchanges (and the primary motivation for all human endeavour). Digital. Fiat. Copper alloy, paper and shekels and shells. They all have to be left at the door of our new deconomy. Put them out of your mind. “Money” of any kind is the past as regards Decentr’s internal deconomics — which is not to say “get rid of” money or tokens altogether, just reappraise their use in a new kind of user-centric economy.

One that can crisis-proof all our financial futures.

Relax, read on… Adopt a new mindset, and our new paradigm becomes clear.

So what is this new mindset? Try thinking like this: the first step is accepting that the only way to transfer and generate economic value and exchanges in a way that is 100% decentralised and user-centric is not through the issuance and distribution of endless different coins/money (for the reasons discussed above), whether fiat or digital, or even, to a lesser extent, “mutual credit” (whose “governance” is trust-based and therefore open to third-party manipulation).

Money just gets in the way. So what do we replace it with? Well, er, nothing. (You read that right.)

Think about it: the issuance, allocation, acquisition and possession of units of exchange (i.e., “money”) is not where power really resides in the global economy. The real power is the ability to influence the exchange rates that dictate the worth of any given money-currency, relative to all other money-currencies.

Following that logic, the solution to create 100% user-centric control of all economies (mainstream and digital) is simple (in theory): this solution requires each individual has full control over all exchange rates between all currencies, fiat and digital, in a way that favours the user when they come to make payments and exchanges (regardless of money-currency used).

Mind-bender, we know. But it makes sense the more you ponder the near-limitless user-centric possibilities.

In essence then, we’re not “anti-money” — why would we be? The mainstream/digital economies offer vast potential for our users to extract value from these centralised economic systems (and for the first time in history, not vice versa). We’re anti-arbitrarily-imposed-and-manipulated-exchange-rates that favour the top 1%. That is the economic issue that our tech is designed to rectify while delivering control over all economies to the individual.

So far, so crazy-sounding, right? Or is it. This notion is actually, in our interpretation, implicit in, for example, Holochain’s Metacurrency principles. Art Brock describes Metacurrency’s broader perspective on “reputation-based” currencies as:

“A formal symbol system for shaping, enabling, and measuring flows.”

Spot the subtext? Reread that definition: on closer inspection, that statement, in our view, more closely resembles a “reputation based” exchange rate than a money-currency per se.

So that is the direction we took. That is what we’re building.

It also needs to be borne in mind that the deconomics is not a theoretical invention; it actually exists (and pre-existed prior to us observing and understanding it) within the algorithms of our back end tech. We subsequently interpreted it and modelled deconomics on these algorithms and the underpinning philosophical assumptions, not the other way around.

The deconomics model means that on our platform each individual user is — not “has access to” — but physically “is” his or her own personal exchange rate; an exchange rate that fluctuates according to user activity in a similar way as money-currency exchange rates (again, reread Art Brock’s quote above).

This paradigm is possible because our system decentralises all online data giving it both the value store properties of money as well as the causal (read our previous post on our “causal Web 3.0/4.0” philosophy for a better understanding of this concept) capabilities of real-world financial markets.

This paradigm is critical because it ensures all currencies, digital and fiat, as well as the mainstream economy are actually modulated by individual users through the generation, exchange and reuse of their own secure and immutable data and meta data. In short, positive online engagement means “your” exchange rate goes up, relative to real world currencies and prices, meaning purchasing goods via our platform for you is cheaper (or at least user-centric to you), relative to all other users and real-world prices.

Fundamentally then, our economy is solely based on the fulfilment of individual potential to underwrite payments and exchanges. How cool is that?

This concept only sounds so alien to us all because the powers that be know that what we propose works. It is within their interests to ensure the uninformed majority stays focused on the stick-and-carrot acquisition of the units of exchange and not turn their eyes to the real engine house that drives the economy and makes the rich ever richer: exchange rates.

We need to forget about putting money front and centre. True economic freedom and egalitarian wealth creation requires that we focus on making sure users are their own exchange rate; from that point on, the global money markets (digital and fiat) work for every individual user— to make rent cheaper… grocery bills and school tuition fees more affordable… a litre of petrol the price of a pint of milk.

In a causal Web 3.0/4.0, it’s up to you, the individual user.

We cannot stress enough: reread the above and apprehend that money (digital or fiat) figures nowhere into the fundamental principles of our deconomy because when a money-currency of any kind is introduced we’re on the slippery slope to centralisation and third-party control.

Once we have achieved this — the word can only be “revolutionary” — socioeconomic paradigm then we also concurrently achieve Decentr’s primary goal.

As discussed, our overriding goal is to eliminate the pursuit of a third-party medium of exchange as the primary human motivation. Instead, Decentr replaces this post-industrial motivation with the pursuit of individual enlightenment and fulfilment as expressed in online data — a pursuit that our tech allows users to utilise in order to meet their basic needs and accrue wealth extracted from all world economies, fiat and digital.

The mechanism of extraction will be our native token, “Dec”. (Imagine the utility that token will have.) Dec will be the sole token underwriting the extraction of data into money, and vice versa, in a data economy that is currently worth USD $1.7TRN. More on this as we move to our token sale.

For now, we only ask you comprehend the theory: as discussed, we have built the tech to achieve this paradigm, and it works. We have the deconomic model ready to support this paradigm and its underpinning philosophical assumptions. We will in our next (and subsequent posts) be going into the conceptual and technical way we have gone about this.

We would also add (though the details of this are for another post), if you get all of the above right, it means a Web 3.0/4.0 is sustainable as it only uses the existing energy already consumed by devices (and not the equivalent of the entire annual electricity consumption of Ireland for Bitcoin mining.)

If you’re still hankering for a glimpse of what a world underpinned by the assumption of individual exchange rates, we recommend these two articles:

Another Engineered Global Economic Crisis Looming? Not if Our Data Economy Can Help it

Digital Currency for Social Good? (Psst, it Works for “Invented” Currency in the Real World)

… as well as, er, this Star Trek clip. (We’re big believers in making science fiction science fact.) At around the 2:45 mark Captain Picard explains the concept behind the “economics of the future”. However, along with similar scenes in other Star Trek films/episodes that come tantalisingly close to revealing transporter/warp drive et al technology, the film cuts to another scene before we get the details of how the technology actually works.

Decentr works to create exactly the apparently “Utopian” socioeconomic conditions this explanation describes. (And we won’t cut away before giving you the details and tech.)

Feel free to get in touch with us for more details about Decentr, or with any questions or suggestions you might have, via the contact form on our website.

Decentr co-founder. Your data is value. Decentr makes your data payable and tradeable online. Decentr.net Medium.com/@DecentrNet t.me/DecentrNet